Cold exposure induces vaso-occlusion and pain in sickle mice that depend on complement activation.

Vaso-occlusive pain episodes (VOE) cause severe pain in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Vaso-occlusive events promote ischemia/reperfusion pathobiology that activates complement. We hypothesized that complement activation is linked to VOE. We used cold to induce VOE in the Townes sickle homozygous for hemoglobin S (HbSS) mouse model and complement inhibitors to determine whether anaphylatoxin C5a mediates VOE. We used a dorsal skinfold chamber to measure microvascular stasis (vaso-occlusion) and von Frey filaments applied to the plantar surface of the hind paw to assess mechanical hyperalgesia in HbSS and control Townes mice homozygous for hemoglobin A (HbAA) mice after cold exposure at 10°C/50°F for 1 hour. Cold exposure induced more vaso-occlusion in nonhyperalgesic HbSS mice (33%) than in HbAA mice (11%) or HbSS mice left at room temperature (1%). Cold exposure also produced mechanical hyperalgesia as measured by paw withdrawal threshold in HbSS mice compared with that in HbAA mice or HbSS mice left at room temperature. Vaso-occlusion and hyperalgesia were associated with an increase in complement activation fragments Bb and C5a in plasma of HbSS mice after cold exposure. This was accompanied by an increase in proinflammatory NF-κB activation and VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression in the liver. Pretreatment of nonhyperalgesic HbSS mice before cold exposure with anti-C5 or anti-C5aR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) decreased vaso-occlusion, mechanical hyperalgesia, complement activation, and liver inflammatory markers compared with pretreatment with control mAb. Anti-C5 or -C5aR mAb infusion also abrogated mechanical hyperalgesia in HbSS mice with ongoing hyperalgesia at baseline. These findings suggest that C5a promotes vaso-occlusion, pain, and inflammation during VOE and may play a role in chronic pain.

MASP-2 and MASP-3 inhibitors block complement activation, inflammation, and microvascular stasis in a murine model of vaso-occlusion in sickle cell disease.

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have ongoing hemolysis that promotes endothelial injury, complement activation, inflammation, vaso-occlusion, ischemia-reperfusion pathophysiology, and pain. Complement activation markers are increased in SCD in steady-state and further increased during vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC). However, the mechanisms driving complement activation in SCD have not been completely elucidated. Ischemia-reperfusion and heme released from hemoglobin during hemolysis, events that characterize SCD pathophysiology, can activate the lectin pathway (LP) and alternative pathway (AP), respectively. Here we evaluated the role of LP and AP in Townes sickle (SS) mice using inhibitory monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to mannose binding lectin (MBL)-associated serine protease (MASP)-2 or MASP-3, respectively. Townes SS mice were pretreated with MASP-2 mAb, MASP-3 mAb, isotype control mAb, or PBS before they were challenged with hypoxia-reoxygenation or hemoglobin. Pretreatment of SS mice with MASP-2 or MASP-3 mAb, markedly reduced Bb fragments, C4d and C5a in plasma and complement deposition in the liver, kidneys, and lungs collected 4 hours after challenge compared to control mAb-treated mice. Consistent with complement inhibition, hepatic inflammation markers NF-ĸB phospho-p65, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin were significantly reduced in SS mice pretreated with MASP-2 or MASP-3 mAb. Importantly, MASP-2 or MASP-3 mAb pretreatment significantly inhibited microvascular stasis (vaso-occlusion) induced by hypoxia-reoxygenation or hemoglobin. These studies suggest that the LP and the AP are both playing a role in promoting inflammation and vaso-occlusion in SCD. Inhibiting complement activation via the LP or the AP might inhibit inflammation and prevent VOC in SCD patients.

Improved Guideline Adherence With Integrated Sickle Cell Disease and Asthma Care.

INTRODUCTION: In children with sickle cell disease (SCD), concomitant asthma is associated with increased morbidity and mortality when compared with children with SCD without asthma. Despite the well-established burden of asthma in children with SCD, no paradigm of care exists for the co-management of these two diseases. METHODS: To address this gap, an integrated SCD and asthma clinic was created in a community health center that included (1) a dual respiratory therapist/asthma case manager; (2) an SCD nurse practitioner with asthma educator certification; (3) an onsite pulmonary function test laboratory; (4) a pediatric hematologist with expertise in managing SCD and asthma; and (5) application of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines. A before (2010-2012) and after (2013-2014) study design was used to assess for improved quality of care with implementation of an integrative care model among 61 children with SCD and asthma followed from 2010 to 2014. RESULTS: Asthma action plan utilization after initial diagnosis increased with the integrative care model (n=16, 56% before, 100% after, p=0.003), as did the use of spirometry in children aged ≥5 years (n=41, 65% before, 95% after, p<0.001) and correction of lower airway obstruction (n=10, 30% before, 80% after, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of an integrative care model for SCD and asthma improved evidence-based asthma care, longer follow-up and evaluation will be needed to determine the impact on SCD-related morbidity.